Racial Disparities in Police Misconduct Allegations in Chicago
Background
Police misconduct complaint processes are intended to ensure accountability, yet evidence suggests that the race and ethnicity of complainants may influence outcomes. Understanding these disparities is crucial for promoting equity and trust in law enforcement.
Purpose
This study examines whether the race and ethnicity of individuals filing police misconduct allegations in Chicago predicts how their complaints are resolved, whether sustained, not sustained, unfounded, or resulting in officer exoneration.
Outcome
Findings reveal significant disparities: Black and Hispanic complainants are far less likely to have allegations sustained. Black complainants are 3–5 times more likely to receive non-sustained or unfounded outcomes, or see officers exonerated, while Hispanic complainants are also less likely to achieve favorable resolutions. These results highlight the need for reforms to reduce racial disparities in the handling of police misconduct complaints and strengthen accountability in Chicago.